Sermon at the Diocese of North Dakota’s Memorial Eucharist for Fr. Cody Unterseher

  • After my correspondence with him following Cody’s death, The Rt. Rev’d Michael Smith, Bishop of North Dakota, asked me to offer a homily at the Diocesan Memorial Eucharist for Fr. Cody. This sermon was preached at St. George’s Church, Bismarck, ND, on that occasion. The lessons for the day were Isaiah 25:6-­9, Psalm 46, 1 Corinthians 15:50-58, and John 11:21-­27.

In the name of God: Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. Amen.

From Cody’s description of himself:

I am a baptized Christian. Above all else, this is what shapes the person I am.

I am still evolving, still being fashioned according to the likeness of Christ.

In my thinking, and in my ministering, I identify almost exclusively–and quite proudly–with the Catholic tradition in Anglicanism.

I am also an ordained priest of Jesus Christ, proudly serving in the Episcopal Church. Holy Priesthood is my calling, my joy and my delight.

But I am a baptized Christian first.

Over the last two weeks, my mind has inevitably been drifting back to the many conversations Cody and I had over the years, on any variety of topics.  Since we first met at General Seminary, where I was preparing for ordination and Cody had just finished a Masters in Sacred Theology and was just starting work on a doctoral degree – the topic of liturgy and identity came up quite often.  Both Cody and I have a natural inclination to interpret almost everything through the lens of our worship and liturgy – because worship, as he often reminded me, is primary theology – theology of the sort that you just can’t get only from reading Paul, or Augustine, or Aquinas – as life-giving, crucial and wonderful as this reading and study is – because worship is active – it is theology made present, theology enacted, theology lived.  And so, from that moment at Holy Baptism when we are sealed by the Holy Spirit and marked as Christ’s own forever, the very nature of everything is changed, because at every moment, we live knowing that we have been joined to the body of Jesus Christ, and knowing that Christ has died, Christ is risen, and Christ will come again.  In this light, every moment becomes an act of worship, and life takes on a Paschal character[1] – and it certainly did for Cody. Therefore, as the Psalmist says in today’s lesson, we shall not fear, though the earth be moved; though the mountains crumble into the uttermost parts of the sea.[2]  And so, Cody’s own self-description, his own credo, becomes the ultimate way to celebrate his life and ministry among us: “I am a baptized Christian first.”

Every since Cody fell ill so suddenly on Easter Friday, and then entered the Church Triumphant a week and a half later, I would imagine that our mindset must be awfully similar to Martha’s in today’s gospel, in which she says to Jesus, “Lord, if you had been here, my brother would not have died.”  More times than I can count – on the trips from my home in Brooklyn to Columbia Presbyterian Hospital in Manhattan, on my trips to Bronxville to  plan Cody’s funeral liturgy, in my meditations on his funeral sermon, even yesterday on my flight here to Bismarck, I keep having Martha’s thoughts echo in my head, albeit in paraphrase: Jesus, if you had been here, Cody would not have died.  Jesus, if you had been here, the most gifted and talented thirty-six year old I’ve ever met would not have fallen ill and died with so much to offer to you, to me, to the church, to the academy, and to the world.  Jesus, if you had been here, I wouldn’t have to be here.  Jesus, if you had been here, I could be back at home, knocking on the door of the room in my Rectory where Cody was to have lived this summer as he worked on his dissertation, and found him there, instead of encountering the emptiness that palpably fills that space now.  Jesus, if you had been here…

Noted author and Holocaust survivor Elie Wiesel once was asked what his favorite quote or phrase was. “And yet…” he responded. “And yet…” I think this is Jesus’ answer to Martha’s statement, and Jesus’ answer to the longings of all our hearts since Cody’s untimely death.  “And yet…”

“And yet…” Paul writes in today’s epistle. “And yet… I tell you a mystery! We will not all die, we will all be changed… in a moment, in the twinkling of an eye… we will be changed. Thanks be to God, who gives us the victory through our Lord Jesus Christ!”[3]

“And yet…” Paul writes in his letter to the Romans. “And yet… do you not know that all of us who have been baptized into Christ Jesus were baptized into his death? Therefore we have been buried with him by baptism into death, so that, just as Christ was raised from the dead by the glory of the Father, so we too might walk in newness of life… For if we have been united with him in a death like his, we will certainly be united with him in a resurrection like his.”[4]

“And yet…” Jesus tells us today. “And yet… even though Cody is not with the church militant here on Earth, at his baptism, he was made forever mine.. Because, before all else, Cody was baptized into my death, he is mine. And because I live… he lives!”

“Jesus lives!” the great Easter hymn proclaims, “Jesus lives! thy terrors now can no longer, death, appall us; Jesus lives! by this we know thou, O grave, canst not enthrall us. Alleluia!”[5]  Because Jesus lives, Cody lives. And because Jesus lives, we, too, live.

This is why Cody’s own self-description – “I am a baptized Christian first” – is so telling.  Because even here, at the edge of the grave, the waters of baptism are the very stuff of life itself.  Through the waters of baptism, at nourished by the heavenly food of this table, Cody lived his life in joyful obedience to our Lord, rejoicing in every moment as an opportunity for praise, worship and adoration.  And if Cody is to impart one message to us in his death, I imagine it would be just this: because, like him, we are baptized into Christ Jesus, and are buried with Jesus in his death and was raised with Jesus in his resurrection – we should live like it. We should walk each day in newness of life, ever being awed by the grace which wholly covered us at our baptism, and covers us anew each day.

In fact, this was the final lesson he imparted to me. On the day before his burial, I left Christ Church, Bronxville with Cody’s vestments, and made the short drive to the nearby funeral home that handled his arrangements.  It had fallen to me to be the one to vest him as a priest before his parents came to say their final goodbyes, and before he was brought to the church for his Vigil and Funeral.  Funeral homes are terrible places – sterile and stale, with a slight whiff of preservative chemicals in the air.  The funeral director led me to the room where Cody lay, and with the help of two others, I vested him in the way he wanted.  When the vesting was complete, the others left the room, so I could have a couple of moments to say my goodbyes to my dear friend.  The room felt like death. It had that stale odor of a funeral home, and Cody himself looked paler than he ever did in life.  For some reason, that morning, I felt compelled to bring some Chrism to anoint him after the vesting.  Whether it was liturgically correct, I didn’t know – and honestly, I stilll don’t know, and quite frankly, don’t care. And so I pulled the oil stock out of my pocket, and anointed Cody. First, as is appropriate for a priest, I anointed his hands – the hands with which he baptized and celebrated the Eucharist. Finally, I anointed his forehead, and recited that great phrase from the Baptismal rite: “Cody, at your baptism, your were sealed by the Holy Spirit, and marked as Christ’s own forever.” Then I sat, wept, and made my final goodbyes. I screwed the cap back onto my oil stock, and went to leave the room. And yet… something was different. I paused for a moment, and tried to figure out what it was. Then I realized – the room no longer had that stale odor. Because instead of getting a whiff of chemicals, my hands now smelled like Chrism – that unique combination of olive oil and herbal essences used at baptism that has an unmistakable scent all its own.  My hands smelled like baptism. Like new life, new birth in Our Lord.  And, for knowing Cody, I’m not sure he would have wanted me to leave that room with any other thought – for as he said, “I am a baptized Christian above all.”

Jesus lives! our hearts know well
naught from us his love shall sever;
life, nor death, nor powers of hell
tear us from his keeping ever.
Alleluia![6]

And so, thanks be to God, through our Lord Jesus Christ, who gives us the victory of life and gives us the grace, even at the edge of the grave, to make our song – Alleluia! Alleluia! Alleluia!

Amen.



[1] Thanks to The Rev’d Dr. Maxwell Johnson, Professor of Liturgy at the University of Notre Dame, for this beautiful observation, made in his sermon at the memorial for Cody held there.

[2] Psalm 46:2

[3] 1 Corinthians 15:51

[4] Romans 6:3-5

[5] “Jesus lives! Thy terrors now,” Christian Friedrich Gellert (1715-1769), 1757, trans. Frances E. Cox (1812-1897), 1841; as found in The Hymnal 1982, #194

[6] ibid.

Sermon at the Resurrection Mass of Father Cody Unterseher

All of us go down to the dust; yet even at the grave we make our song:

Alleluia, alleluia, alleluia!

In the name of God: Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. Amen.

The disciples were full of questions about God. Said the master, “God is the unknown and the unknowable. Every statement about Him, every answer to your questions, is a distortion of the truth.” The disciples were bewildered. “Then why do you speak of Him at all?” “Why does the bird sing?” said the master.[1]

On Thursday morning, as we gathered here at Christ Church to begin the planning for today’s Mass of the Resurrection, Cody’s mother Carla handed me a copy of this story, “The Song of the Bird,” by the Jesuit priest Anthony de Mello.  Perhaps, she said to me, it might be useful in the preparation of the sermon for the mass, as it was a favorite of Cody’s, one he had shared with several friends and family.

As it turns out, I can think of few stories better to use on such an occasion as today.  For Cody lived just as the bird – always singing the Lord’s song, living his life as a sacrifice of praise and thanksgiving to the Triune God whom he loved, and who so deeply loves him. It was simply who he was.  He wholly exulted in his Lord even when God seemed most foreign, most unknown, most unknowable. Cody, like the bird, could not keep from singing, even on days like today. Every fiber of his being rejoiced in God his savior, every moment was an act of worship. All of us, who have gathered here today to celebrate his life and ministry among us, know this of our dear friend and brother in Christ Jesus.

Ever since Cody so suddenly fell ill, and especially since he moved from the Church Militant to the Church Triumphant this Wednesday, every fiber of my being has told me that this shouldn’t be happening. That we shouldn’t be here.  That thirty-six year olds are not supposed to have aneurysms.  That someone as good, and holy, and loving, and intelligent as Cody is not supposed to leave us in his prime, with so much to offer the church, to the academy, and to the world.  Even as I stand in this pulpit now, and see my friend lying here, I simply want someone to pinch me, to wake me up, to end the nightmare of the past few days.

I imagine that Jesus’ disciples must have felt the same way after Good Friday, as they looked back on their final few days with their Lord.  They must have wanted their nightmare to end, as they sat in fear on Friday evening, pondering over what Jesus had told them only the night before – those same words we hear in today’s Gospel:

Do not let your hearts be troubled. Believe in God, believe also in me… I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again and will take you to myself, so that where I am, there you may be also.[2]

On the day that Jesus died, the disciples were left with only their grief, their great sense of loss and pain, their confusion at how their Lord could tell them, in a time like this, to “not let their hearts be troubled.” After all, they had seen that Jesus had gone not to a great mansion, or to a palace, or to triumph, but to the cross. To death. To the grave. Back to the very dust of the earth. Yet we know what the disciples could not have known on that fateful Friday – that the glories of Easter were only just beyond the horizon. That the Risen Lord would rise from the grave, and, destroying death, would make the whole creation new. And that the risen Lord sent those same disciples who had sat in fear on Friday night out in to the world only days later – commanding them to go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit.[3]

Paul spoke to this great mystery in his Letter to the Romans: “Do you not know,” he asks, “that all of us who have been baptized into Christ Jesus were baptized into his death? Therefore we have been buried with him by baptism into death, so that, just as Christ was raised from the dead by the glory of the Father, so we too might walk in newness of life. For if we have been united with him in a death like his, we will certainly be united with him in a resurrection like his… If we have died with Christ, we will also live with him.”[4]

It is this great mystery that we celebrate today – the sure and certain knowledge that Cody, who joyfully lived and sang knowing that he was sealed by the Holy Spirit in Baptism and marked as Christ’s own forever – that he was baptized into Christ’s death and is forever united with him in his resurrection.  We celebrate the knowledge that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor rulers, nor things present, nor things to come, nor powers, nor height, nor depth, nor anything else in all creation, will be able to separate him from the love of God in Christ Jesus our Lord.[5]

We know that despite the pain and sadness of this day, as we commend our pastor, teacher, son, and friend Cody to God’s gracious care, that this is not Cody’s Good Friday moment, for as a Christian, baptized into Jesus’ body, Cody was not a Good Friday person. Cody is a resurrection person. Death cannot separate him from God’s love, because he at his baptism, he was already raised with Christ.

Indeed, nothing could ever possibly separate us from the love of God, for as Christians, we believe that even heaven itself is not God’s final word. We look forward to the great feast that Isaiah foretold, in which heaven and earth are joined, when death is swallowed up forever, and when the whole creation is made new.  We know that even as today we commend our dear brother Cody to the dust of the earth, that our Lord’s victory over death assures that this very same dust will be that upon which a new and more glorious creation is being built.  Even now… Even today.

My very first encounter with Cody was when I was a prospective student, looking to enter General Seminary in 2008.  I visited in the spring, towards the end of the semester, and attended the noonday mass at which Cody had been assigned to preach.  I remember it vividly, because in his sermon, without hesitation or reservation, Cody sang:

My life flows on in endless song;
Above earth’s lamentation
I hear the sweet though far off hymn
That hails a new creation:
Through all the tumult and the strife
I hear the music ringing;
It finds an echo in my soul—
How can I keep from singing?

What though my joys and comforts die?
The Lord my Savior liveth;
What though the darkness gather round!
Songs in the night He giveth:
No storm can shake my inmost calm
While to that refuge clinging;
Since Christ is Lord of Heav’n and earth,
How can I keep from singing?

I lift mine eyes; the cloud grows thin;
I see the blue above it;
And day by day this pathway smoothes
Since first I learned to love it:
The peace of Christ makes fresh my heart,
A fountain ever springing:
All things are mine since I am His—
How can I keep from singing?[6]

AMEN.


[1] Anthony de Mello, S.J. “The Song of the Bird”

[2] John 14:1, 3

[3] Matthew 28:19

[4] Romans 6:3-5, 8

[5] Romans 8:38-39

[6] “How Can I Keep from Singing,” Robert Wadsworth Lowry.

Sermon for the 4th Sunday after Epiphany / January 29, 2012

Propers of the Day:
Deuteronomy 18:15-20 / Psalm 111 / 1 Corinthians 8:1-13  / Mark 1:21-28 

In November of 1958, American author and Nobel laureate John Steinbeck received a letter from his eldest son Thom, then a teenager studying away from home at a boarding school.  In the letter, Thom told his father that he had fallen desperately in love with a girl at his boarding school.  In response to his son’s note, Steinbeck sent back a letter in response – a letter filled with tender love for his young son. Here’s a portion of what he writes:

Dear Thom:

We had your letter this morning. I will answer it from my point of view and of course Elaine will from hers.

First — if you are in love — that’s a good thing — that’s about the best thing that can happen to anyone. Don’t let anyone make it small or light to you.

Second — There are several kinds of love. One is a selfish, mean, grasping, egotistical thing which uses love for self-importance. This is the ugly and crippling kind. The other is an outpouring of everything good in you — of kindness and consideration and respect — not only the social respect of manners but the greater respect which is recognition of another person as unique and valuable. The first kind can make you sick and small and weak but the second can release in you strength, and courage and goodness and even wisdom you didn’t know you had…

But I don’t think you were asking me what you feel. You know better than anyone. What you wanted me to help you with is what to do about it — and that I can tell you.

Glory in it for one thing and be very glad and grateful for it.

The object of love is the best and most beautiful. Try to live up to it.

Steinbeck goes on to add a few concluding words, looking forward to a later visit with his young son and his crush during a future break from the boarding school.  Steinbeck’s letter is perhaps one of the most wonderful expressions I’ve encountered of the nature of love – I’ve filed his letter away both for use in the future when doing pre-marital counseling, not to mention to have for my own sake.  Steinbeck’s letter, believe it or not, strikes right to the very heart of one of our appointed pieces of scripture for today.

Of all of the books of the New Testament, perhaps none is as focused on the nature of love as Paul’s First Letter to the Corinthians.  This may seem surprising, especially when we consider our epistle readings from First Corinthians over the past several weeks: we have heard Paul speak about sexual ethics, preaching that “The body is meant not for fornication but for the Lord, and the Lord for the body.” Last week, Paul wrote that “let even those who have wives be as though they had none, and those who mourn as though they were not mourning, and those who rejoice as though they were not rejoicing.” And this week, Paul writes to the Church in Corinth about the practice of eating food sacrificed to idols. In fact, as soon as we begin to read this epistle, it becomes clear that Paul is speaking to a community that is immersed in conflict on every level. Within the space of twelve chapters, Paul writes a condemnations of a man sleeping with his mother-in-law and of lawsuits among the community of disciples in Corinth, he writes instructing people who haven’t yet married that “it is better to marry than to burn” and writes to still others telling them that it is best not to eat food sacrificed to idols. Paul writes to defend his own authority as an apostle, writes to condemn abuses by the wealthy at the Eucharistic table, and writes seeking to end the abuse of some members of the community by others who perceive themselves as having greater spiritual gifts. There are seemingly an infinite number of conflicts, an infinite number of problems, with what would seem to be an infinite number of solutions.  And yet, with so many different ailments, so many sicknesses in the Corinthian church, Paul deftly weaves them all together as symptoms of a single illness: the church has forgotten how to love.

Today’s epistle addresses the conflict among community members in Corinth concerning the consumption of food that has been sacrificed in pagan rituals. As would have been common in any Mediterranean city of Paul’s time, the food offered to idols in pagan temples would then subsequently be sold in the marketplace; it was conceivable, if not likely, that the cut of steak on the Corinthian Christian’s banquet table my have been sacrificed to Zeus earlier in the day. This caused controversy: some in the community argued that it would be a sacrilege for a Christian to eat food sacrificed to another God, while others said that since it was clear there is only one true God, it didn’t matter where the food came from – simply calling a piece of food a “Zeus Burger” didn’t make it so.

Paul’s response to the church in Corinth gives a clear answer to which side of this debate is correct – of course they can eat this food, he writes, because “even though there may be so-called gods in heaven or on earth– yet for us there is one God, the Father, from whom are all things and for whom we exist, and one Lord, Jesus Christ.” But, Paul stresses, who’s right on this particular question doesn’t matter so much. In fact, it barely matters at all.

What matters, he says, is that the community needs to look up from their plates, and into the faces of one another. Paul notes that not every one in this community of converts understands that there is nothing wrong with eating the food sacrificed to idols. In fact, many are new converts from the very religions who have sacrificed that same food, and so “they still think of the food they eat as food offered to an idol; and their conscience is hurt.” So while one side of the argument may be correct, and have the “right answer,” Paul writes, when these new converts see  people with the right answerseating in the temple of an idol, could not these converts be hurt in their weakness, and be led to fall away from God? Has the community been so caught up in its quest to be correct – in its desire to be right – that it has failed to perceive the emotions, concerns, and difficulties of those around them they are called to love?

The problem in the Church, Paul says, is not food, or sex, or money, or any of the myriad other issues that confront us as much today as they did the church in the first century. Our problem is that we become so tied up in the idolatry of self – in the selfish, mean, grasping, egotistical thing that was as real to Paul and the Corinthian church as it was when Steinbeck described this reality to his son, and as it still is today. The problem isn’t idols, or pieces of meat, or correct answers; the problem is a failure to see one another, to meet one another, to wait patiently for one another. Jesus’ love compels us to reach out in love and concern for others, seeing each other as valuable and beloved. In doing so, as Steinbeck later wrote, strength, and courage and goodness and even wisdom are then released in us that we didn’t know we had. Jesus’ love charges us to give up and sacrifice everything of ourselves for the sake of others in a way that ultimately builds us up in ways we could never seek to build ourselves. Love means giving up of ourselves so completely to one another, being so knit together with each other, that we are raised by and through others and not unto ourselves. You’ve heard how Steinbeck describes love – but consider the words Paul gives to the church in Corinth as he concludes his thoughts on their many arguments. I suspect you’ve his words before:

If I speak in the tongues of mortals and of angels, but do not have love, I am a noisy gong or a clanging cymbal. And if I have prophetic powers, and understand all mysteries and all knowledge, and if I have all faith, so as to remove mountains, but do not have love, I am nothing. If I give away all my possessions, and if I hand over my body so that I may boast, but do not have love, I gain nothing.

Love is patient; love is kind; love is not envious or boastful or arrogant or rude. It does not insist on its own way; it is not irritable or resentful; it does not rejoice in wrongdoing, but rejoices in the truth. It bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things.

Love never ends. But as for prophecies, they will come to an end; as for tongues, they will cease; as for knowledge, it will come to an end. For we know only in part, and we prophesy only in part; but when the complete comes, the partial will come to an end… For now we see in a mirror, dimly, but then we will see face to face. Now I know only in part; then I will know fully, even as I have been fully known. And now faith, hope, and love abide, these three; and the greatest of these is love.

While our lectionary never gets us there, each of our lectionary readings from First Corinthians point to, and build to, this ultimate aim: every conflict, every problem, is nothing in the face of true love for one another, love that looks to to the needs, concerns, struggles of others above and beyond our own. It means putting aside who is “right” for the moment, and simply seeking to meet each other where we are. This is the love that is shown to us on the cross, and this is what it means for us to love one another as Christ’s body.

I read to you the beginning of Steinbeck’s letter to his son, written out of his own deep compassion and care for his child. The end, I believe, is just as instructive:

And don’t worry about losing. If it is right, it happens — The main thing is not to hurry. Nothing good gets away.

Lord Jesus, through your grace, teach us not to worry about losing. Teach us to love without reserve, without concern, without worry, that nothing – and no one – that you have made good may ever get away.

Amen.

 

Sermon for The First Sunday after the Epiphany / Baptism of Our Lord – January 8, 2012

Take a quick moment to think back to a time in life where things seemed stuck in a holding pattern. I’m fairly certain that all of us have had these moments, these times where questions seem to outnumber and outweigh any answers we might think we have. It seems like these moments of confusion come when we are asked to risk something of ourselves – to leave our souls open to being either completely filled with joy, or totally hurt, to put our very hearts on the line – for something that is critically and dearly important. These moments often come during the critical junctures in our lives – when we are left considering whether to chance our livelihood to take on a new job in an unfamiliar place. When we try to decide whether lay our hearts on the line to enter into a new relationship. When we debate whether we’re truly ready for a next big step – buying a house, or having children, or retiring from work. When we are left trying to pick up and patch up the results of our brokenness after we fail our friends. When we try to find again who we are after we lose someone we love dearly. These are moments when we are left searching, discerning, reaching out. These are times that we are looking for the past to come into a clearer perspective, when we are looking for way forward to be made clear, when we search for answers. For a sign. A Showing. A manifestation. A making clear of who we are, and whose we are. When we search for an Epiphany.

It is to my constant amazement how our observance of time in this holy gathering – as Christ’s body, the church – reflects so closely the deepest longings and emotions of our human hearts. It is true, as the writer of Qoheloth tells us, that there is a time for every thing – and every stirring of the soul – under heaven. On Friday, the church celebrated The Feast of The Epiphany – Of the Manifestation and Making known of Jesus Christ to that larger world outside of Bethlehem. The Feast of Epiphany commemorates when the infant Jesus was visited by wise men from the East. And today, on the First Sunday after the Epiphany, the church commemorates the Baptism of Our Lord, that moment at the very beginning of his public ministry when Jesus descends into the water of the River Jordan to be baptized by John, and emerges from the to see the heavens torn open, and the Spirit descending upon him like a dove, and hear the voice of God say, “you are my Son, the Beloved; with you I am well pleased.” Today is the Sunday that we celebrate this moment of clarity, of answering, of manifestation, in the Baptism of Our Lord in the Jordan River. And because we have been joined to Christ in Holy Baptism, and knit into his body, we celebrate how all of our own desires, longings, moments of seeking and questioning – our own quests for Epiphany – reach their fulfillment, and their completion in Jesus Christ, who is all in all.

In today’s gospel, Mark recounts how “Jesus came from Nazareth of Galilee and was baptized by John in the Jordan. And just as Jesus was coming up out of the water, he saw the heavens torn apart and the Spirit descending like a dove on him. And a voice came from heaven, ‘You are my Son, the Beloved; with you I am well pleased.’” The scene of today’s gospel is well implanted in our memory by scores of memorable pieces of art, such as the icon depicted on the cover of our service leaflet today. It seems to fit the theme of Epiphany – of visible manifestation. And yet, as we read from Mark’s gospel more closely, we find that the voice coming from heaven was not heard by all present – but by Christ alone. Throughout Mark’s gospel, the Messiahship of Jesus is gradually revealed and shown to the world; throughout the gospel, we see numerous instances where Jesus charges people not to speak of his miracles, or of his identity.

And yet in Mark’s gospel, despite the veil of secrecy that appears to surround Jesus’ identity as God’s son, as the Beloved, we hear voices proclaim Jesus as just that on three separate occasions. It occurs first at Jesus’ baptism, when the heavens open and the voice proclaims Jesus as the Beloved. At the Transfiguration, while Jesus is seated in splendor with Moses and Elijah, and a voice proclaims to Peter, James, and John, “This is my Son, the Beloved; listen to him!” And finally, on Good Friday, at the crucifixion, when darkness covered Jerusalem, after Jesus took his last breath, the voice of the centurion proclaimed, “Truly this man was God’s Son.” God in Christ is made visible, made manifest, not only in splendor, but most especially, and most publically, at the cross.

I don’t think this is a coincidence at all. Because that Jesus who is made visible to us in scripture is not just the baby in Bethlehem visited by the Magi. Because the Jesus we proclaim is not just the man emerging from the Jordan, or the one transfigured in splendor. Because Jesus made visible is Jesus on the cross, and Jesus raised from the dead. When we celebrate Epiphany, the Manifestation, when we celebrate our Lord made visible – we celebrate that he is made visible not simply in his life, or in his miracles, but most of all, in his death and resurrection. The Jesus who is all in all, and who is himself the Epiphany to our own longings, the one who reaches out to us in our own deepest moments of discernment and confusion, is Jesus born, baptized, transfigured, crucified, and risen.

The baptisms we will celebrate in a few short moments are not baptisms into a single moment in Christ’s life. Because, as Paul tells us, we are buried with Christ by baptism into his death, so that, just as Christ was raised from the dead by the glory of the Father, so we too might walk in newness of life. For when we have been united with him in a death like his, we will certainly be united with him in a resurrection like his. Beloved in Christ, the waters of baptism are dangerous. In the waters of baptism, we are called to drown, to be willing to give up everything, to die, believing that we will be raised in Jesus Christ. And in this same baptism – in this same death and resurrection, we are knit into his body, made forever one with him. And just surely as Samuel and Arianna will be knit into Christ – buried and raised with him – they, too, are called to make Christ visible in the world. We all are. We are each called to manifest Christ to the world around us. To be the light shining in darkness. To keep the covenant we have made, and boldly confess him as Lord and Savior.

To be Epiphanies, shining out into the world. Amen.

A Modest Proposal: Of Exorcism, Football, and Tim Tebow

(As the title of this post suggests, it follows after Jonathan Swift’s A Modest Proposal. If you are unaware of the genre of literature of which Swift’s masterpiece is a part, I suggest you research it before being outraged at my writing. Thank you.)

I recently received the gift of a great library of liturgical books, covering the era from before the time of Christ to today. I was particularly pleased to receive several books from the Pre-Vatican II Roman Rite – including several copies of the Missale Romanum and several associated books, such as the Rituale Romanum. I don’t ever envision using these books – as much as I enjoy a liturgy entirely in Latin as a liturgical geek, I don’t ever really find it appropriate for public worship – unless, of course, you are in a society comprised of lots of fluent Latin speakers. I like that Vatican II made the vernacular the standard for public worship – no matter how much the current leadership of the Congregation for Divine Worship and the current occupant of the Chair of Peter may wish otherwise. I am also, of course, an Episcopalian, and at that, a Prayer Book Fundamentalist. The liturgies used in this church are to be those in the Book of Common Prayer, and its approved supplements, like The Book of Occasional Services, Lesser Feasts and Fasts, and the like.

From my copy of the Rituale Romanum.

But – nonetheless – as a complete and total liturgical nerd, I feel a need to use these books. Somehow. Especially the missals. They were, after all, designed for use, not to be museum pieces. Of particular interest to me, I must confess, is a chapter in my copy of the Rituale Romanum: “Ritus Exorcizandi Obsessos A Dæmonio” – “The Rite for Exorcizing those Posessed by Demons.” Now let me be clear, I do believe that exorcism is real. And I never wish to perform an actual exorcism – this is for people with faculties to so.

In fact, one of my favorite pages any liturgical book of the Episcopal Church is found in The Book of Occasional Services, on the page entitled ”Concerning Exorcism” -

The practice of expelling evil spirits by means of prayer and set formulas derives its authority from the Lord himself who identified these acts as signs of his messiahship. Very early in the life of the Church the development and exercise of such rites were reserved to the bishop, at whose discretion they might be delegated to selected presbyters and others deemed competent.

In accordance with this established tradition, those who find themselves in need of such a ministry should make the fact known to the bishop, through their parish priest, in order that the bishop may determine whether exorcism is needed, who is to perform the rite, and what prayers or other formularies are to be used.

I’ve never seen two paragraphs so intricately constructed in a book of the Episcopal Church. Here’s my translation:

Dude, do you really want to do this? Are you completely serious? I mean, we know this appears in scriptures, so we can’t totally disregard it.

Ok, fine. If you really think this is necessary – and I mean REALLY think this is necessary – you can talk to your Bishop. That way, she can tell you that you’re nuts, and get you into proper counseling. Because we won’t – that would be mean. Or maybe, just maybe, he might agree with you. But we sure as heck aren’t letting you do an exorcism.

(Sidebar: Interestingly, in the Episcopal Church, as in the Roman Church, it seems to be envisioned that exorcism is rare, and when performed, is to be done by those with a faculty to do so. In the Roman Church, of course, faculties are granted to perform certain tasks – to hear confessions, for instance. Exorcism, likewise, is a faculty granted to a particular priest. This is one of the few cases I can think of in the Anglican / Episcopal Prayer Book tradition where it is envisioned that particular priests have faculties.)

But I still want use these books, you understand. Books are made to be used. So, several months ago, I began the search for a subject. It’s been long and arduous – few people, in today’s world, seem to know the demonically possessed. But, at long last, with the advice and concurrence of several people, I think we have found a subject. (Episcopal consent, is, of course, outstanding.) That subject is Denver Broncos QB Tim Tebow.

What, you ask? Is this the same Tim Tebow of “tebowing” fame – of shouting out to Jesus at every possible mount that it is appropriate, and a few at which it is not? Of fame from that Focus on the Family sponsored anti-abortion ad? That gentleman of such seemingly wholesome character – the Tim Tebow who so many would crave to have as their son? I’m not sure. Here’s a photo I’ve found of the lad:

The subject for the rite in question.

Herein, I make the case for the exorcism of Timothy Richard Tebow.

There are only two explanations for Tebow’s recent spate of good luck in the NFL. Tebow led the broncos to six straight come-from-behind victories earlier this year. That’s right – six. Many of those came in the fourth quarter, with very little time left on the clock. His success has been nothing short of incredible. Tebow had an incredible career as the QB for the Florida Gators, including winning the Heisman Trophy and a BCS National Championship. But nobody can be that good at the NFL level. Thus we are led to two possible explanations for his performance: the Divine Favor of Our Lord, or Demonic Posession.

I’m a believer in the anthropic principle – that we understand God as revealed in creation. As such, certain “rules” emerge in the observation of the created order. Football – as among the most marvelous parts of God’s created order – is no exception.

Among the pieces of divine revelation that has emerged in regards to football: Florida QBs have lackluster NFL careers. For example, consider Rex Grossman’s production as the Redskins QB this year. Nothing to write home about – so spotty, in fact, that he was benched for a while this year. While he did have a role in leading the 2006 Chicago Bears to the NFC Championship, his performance thereafter has been spotty.

Consider a few other Florida QBs in the NFL. Do you recall Heisman-winning Florida QB Danny Wuerffel’s NFL career? Right, neither do I. How about the careers of Doug Johnson or Chris Leak? My point exactly. (I kid you not, Chris Leak is playing for the Montreal Alouettes – in the Canadian Football League. The CFL. I had no idea it still existed, eh?)

Likewise, Our Lord has revealed other aspects concerning NFL performance. For instance, long deliveries are bad. Long delivery gives the pass rush ample chance to force fumbles, interceptions, and turnovers. Tebow is a thrower – not a passer. Also revealed: over reliance on physical play-making among QBs doesn’t work. Tebow’s success at Florida was largely predicated on his ability to be a physical play-maker under pressure. But, honestly, an NFL offensive line is not the equivalent to OL in college – even at the best colleges of the SEC, like Alabama or LSU. No matter how good Alabama or LSU are. So an over reliance on physical playmaking will lead to a short career. Further revealed by Our Lord: being able to read a defense is a must. And it’s been very clear this season, for all of Tebow’s accomplishments, that he still does not have that ability.

Our Lord has revealed the qualities to be admired and respected in a quarterback. Behold, Packers QB Aaron Rodgers. His passing ability is incredible, and his ability to read a defense is second to none. He has the ability to make physical plays, but he doesn’t rely on it too much. And the record for the Packers this year: 15-1. Again, behold, Saints QB Drew Brees. Passing ability is fantastic – so incredible, in fact, that he has broken Dan Marino’s single season passing record. He can read a defense, although not as well as Rodgers, to my mind. The Saints record: 13-3. So we come to young Timothy Richard Tebow. His foibles have been discussed, as well as his odd playmaking ability. The record of the Broncos: 8-8.

Demons and evil are never finally triumphant – such is the assurance of the Gospels. Yet they may have erratic streaks of incredible power – such we are told the allegory of Revelation. The records are clear – Our Lord has bestowed abundant blessing upon the Rodgers and the Packers, and Brees and the Saints – but not so much upon the Broncos. There may be but one conclusion: Tebow’s ability comes from a supernatural force, but not from Our Lord. The man is, unfortunately, possessed. And an exorcism is needed. And I have the books.

Therefore, with appropriate Episcopal sanction, I would be happy to assist in such a rite. For instance, I can cower in the back of the room in fear as a qualified exorcist calls the demons out from young Mr. Tebow that he may live a fruitful life in further service to Our Lord. I simply, and humbly, offer my book so that it may be used. You know, the way I said I wanted it to be used. Way back in the beginning of my proposal.

 

Sermon for Holy Name – January 1, 2012

It’s quite funny how often I fail to remember that Jesus was, in fact, a devout Palestinian Jew.  Every time I hear Jesus’ voice in the gospels, he’s speaking to in English – not in the Hebrew or Aramaic he most certainly actually spoke.  When I picture what sort of clothing Jesus wore, I generally imagine a simple white tunic or toga-like garment – I almost never think of him wearing a yarmulke, or the tallit with tzitzit – the traditional prayer shawl with fringes still worn everyday by Orthodox Jews.  When I think of Jesus at worship – even though I know its in the synagogues – my mental process association generally groups that worship with our Sunday worship – even though visits to the synagogue could be a daily affair, with the principle observance of the Sabbath on Friday night into Saturday.  As much as I hate to admit it, the Jesus of my imagination looks an awful lot like me, and not like the lower-class, Palestinian Jew that he was.

Jesus’ Jewish background and faith informed his entire life.  And it is Jesus’ life as a devout Jew that brings us today’s observation in our calendar – The Feast of the Holy Name.  The designation of January 1st as the Feast of the Holy Name is actually a relatively new event – previous editions of the Book of Common Prayer observed January 1st the Feast of the Circumcision. Perhaps our squeamish tendencies got the better of us in changing the name of today’s feast; nevertheless, today is the same observance one the church has held since around the year 567.  But nonetheless, it is important. So valuble, in fact, that the Prayer Book tells us that when January 1st, falls on a Sunday, The Feast of the Holy Name takes precedence over the regular seasonal day, over the observance of the “First Sunday after Christmas”

January 1st is, of course, the eighth day after Christmas Day. And as today’s reading from Luke’s gospel recalls: “After eight days had passed, it was time to circumcise the child; and he was called Jesus, the name given by the angel before he was conceived in the womb.” Torah, the Law of Moses, requires that every male child be circumcised on the eighth day after his birth. Circumcision, God had told Abraham long before, was to be the sign of his covenant to make a great nation of Abraham and his descendants.  At Mount Sinai, that covenant was further reaffirmed: Israel was made God’s special possession among all people.  And in today’s lesson, many, many generations later, in the fullness of time, an eight day old boy, whose place as Son of the Most High was announced by the Angel Gabriel nine months earlier – an eight day old boy, whose birth was announced by the angels to shepherds in the fields – an eight day old boy, Emmanuel, God with us, God incarnate – was given that same sign of the covenant.  At his circumcision, that eight-day old boy was marked with the sign of that covenant of which he himself was sent to fulfill.  And, just as the angel had told Mary before, he is given that holy name we commemorate today – Jesus.

The name Jesus comes to us from Latin, which itself is a translation of the Greek Iesous.  Translation and transliteration have obscured that original name given to Jesus at his circumcision some two thousand years ago. That name would have been Aramaic – Yeshua.  This was, in fact, a common name; it appeared throughout the Old Testament, and the young Jesus would have likely had peers who were also named Yeshua.  But that name – common as it may have been in Our Lord’s day – finds its great significance, and great holiness, in God incarnate who received that name. For Jesus, Yeshua, has a meaning in its original Aramaic – God delivers.

Jesus’ name may have been nothing special in his own day, but it was forever made holy when that child bore that name – would bear the promise that God made to his people – that he would deliver them; that he would deliver us. For in Jesus, God does deliver us from our own sinfulness, from our own fallen-ness, from our own broken-ness; God delivers us with his very son, with God’s very self. God delivers us in Jesus Christ . So we remember Christ’s Holy Name, that holy name which Paul tells us is “above every name” – not because of its greatness, and its grandeur, and glory – but because it points to God who emptied himself of those very things, taking on human likeness, so that we might be delivered. So that we might be brought back to God.

Our names – in and of themselves, when they are given to us at birth, don’t carry much meaning as to who we are, or what we shall be. Cultural custom usually means that our names imply whether we are male or female, or perhaps our ethnic background, but beyond that, you cannot tell much about who we are simply from our name alone.  But names are important.  We cannot imagine the ones we love – our spouses and significant others, our children, our friends – by any name other than the ones they have.  And as we know each other, the name takes on a new meaning of its own – meaning steeped in shared experiences, in shared lives, in shared love.  Meaning is found in the one who bears these names.  And so it is with Jesus.

As Christianity developed, of course, we no longer believe it to be necessary circumcise male children to initiate them into covenant with God through Jesus Christ.  But we are called into that same covenant relationship that Jesus was marked by, and came in fulfillment of.  It is in the waters of baptism that we are marked as Christ’s own forever, and sealed with the name of Jesus.  Our baptism carries with it a covenant – one we reaffirm each time we baptize new members of the church, as we will again next week.  In that covenant, we promise “that we will proclaim by word and example the Good News of God in Christ.” That we will bear the name of Jesus – with its Good News that “God delivers” – to the whole world.  That we will for ever seek, by the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, that we will perfectly love him, and worthily magnify his holy name.

Eternal Father, you gave to your incarnate Son the holy name of Jesus to be the sign of our salvation: Plant in every heart, we pray, the love of him who is the Savior of the world, our Lord Jesus Christ; who lives and reigns with you and the Holy Spirit, one God, in glory everlasting. Amen.

Christmas in Chelsea Square

My alma mater, The General Theological Seminary of the Episcopal Church, was featured in a CBS Special this Christmas Eve. In fact, they aired opposite the Midnight Mass with the Pope from the Saint Peter’s Basillica in Rome. Except ours was all in English, with four-part harmonies in the music. Point GTS, I dare say.

In case you missed it, because you were busy doing things like, say, sleeping at 11:35 pm on Christmas Eve, you can now watch it online, in glorious 1080p if you so choose.

Merry Christmas!

Ordination and the Time Thereafter…

It has become standard in the letters of agreement in the Diocese of Long Island for parish clergy to receive the weeks after Christmas and Easter off. I can’t even begin to say how grateful I am for this, especially given how momentous this December has been: in the span of two weeks, I was ordained as a priest, observed the final two Sundays of Advent, had our Transitioning Clergy meeting in Garden City (where I was asked to celebrate the Eucharist), the regular assortment of holiday parties and festivities, and finally, celebrated and preached at my first Christmas Eve Midnight Mass and Christmas Day mass. It has been an incredibly busy time, and I’m just now starting to have a chance to catch my breath, to reflect, to rest.

"Therefore, Father, through Jesus Christ your Son, give your Holy Spirit to David; fill him with grace and power, and make him a priest in your Church."

One of the questions I was asked most often after my priesting – by parishioners, clergy colleagues, family and friends alike – was “do you feel any different?” I’ve struggled to answer that question on so many different levels. If the question was “are you any different?” the answer would be simple – yes. I’m catholic enough to believe that there is an ontological change at ordination; ordination is not simply the church’s recognition of a pre-existing reality, or an installation into an office: ordination confers grace. That’s an easy question to answer from my perspective. But “do you feel any different?” – well – yes and no. I was struck at my first celebration of the mass on Advent III how often I felt like I was “play-acting.” At a core level, I know I wasn’t – but it was so very strange when, after 26 years of watching other people at the altar celebrating the mass using these same prayers, suddenly, it was me. I grew up as an Episcopalian, and have known nothing but the 1979 Book of Common Prayer, so the words I was praying were abundantly familiar. But for 26 years, they had come from some other person’s lips. Not mine. Perhaps the most astounding moment of my first mass, at least to my thinking, was when I elevated the chalice at the per ipsum at the end of the Eucharistic Prayer, and saw my own face reflected in the silver. It was sort of like having a loud voice shout at me, “Ready or not, you’re a priest now! Hope you like what you see…”

In time, I imagine celebrating the mass will turn back into prayer for me, as it was before I was ordained, either as a deacon or as a priest. It doesn’t feel like it yet. Perhaps because the smell of chrism is still quite fresh on my palms, and I’m very, very much new to this gig. It’s hard when the normal patterns of prayer are disrupted, when any big event fundamentally changes the way you relate to other people and to God. In time, you live into that new reality – but it does take some time. Falling down a few times as you get used to the new terrain. And being willing to get up, fall down a few more times, until the ground that once seemed so unsteady becomes the new normal.

So when did I first begin to actually breathe in the new reality – to not just be different, but feel different? Exactly one week later. One week later, I made the trek from my far corner of southwest Brooklyn to Larchmont, New York, to participate in a friend’s ordination to the priesthood. Interestingly enough, priesthood became real to me when I added my hands to the “holy huddle” in making someone else a priest. Not because I was no longer the “newest priest in the Church.” That common introduction of new clergy fades very rapidly, and at least to me, doesn’t mean much. Perhaps it was because in laying my hands on another person at their ordination, it was among the very first times I had was able to very clearly, visibly, and tangibly be a part of someone else living out their own call to discipleship. He went under the hands of the bishop, the college of presbyters lent our hands to the pile – and he came out a priest. And while I imagine he didn’t feel any different – at that point, I did. Because I could see where I played a part – a teeny-weeny, small, peripheral part – but a part nonetheless – in making a priest. A disciple. Just like Jesus told us to.

My job is awesome.

Sermon for Christmas Eve – Midnight Mass

The room that is supposed to be the master bedroom of my rectory is largely empty.  I actually sleep in a room that is immediately next to the master bedroom – my room has a ceiling fan, and so that room is slightly more comfortable, especially during the summertime.  Thus the master bedroom has remained pretty much empty.  In fact, when I arrived in June, even the room’s radiator had been taken out! The only thing was in the master bedroom when I moved in was a single, very large work of art.  On this huge piece of wood is an image of the Virgin Mary, tenderly cradling an infant Jesus in her arms. Outside of the frame, in the upper levels of the piece, is an image of an adult Jesus, surrounded by the faces of the angels. They eyes of all of them look down on the serene image of the Madonna and Child that sits below them.  This painting, this icon, remains the only thing in that bedroom.  I haven’t managed to repaint and refinish the room yet, and I don’t have enough furniture to fill the space, so it remains as it is – empty, except for that portrait of the Madonna and Child leaning up against the southwest wall.  One would expect to find the portrait somewhere in a church, or over an altar – which is precisely from whence it came. The portrait normally hangs over the altar in the Chapel of Peace next door. But time has taken its toll on our roof, and as leaks started to plague the chapel, it was moved into the rectory for safekeeping.  And so it sits, a giant non-sequitur in the middle of my rectory. Here, where you would expect to find a bed and dressing chest, or perhaps some chairs and a table, you find nothing – nothing except for that giant, unexpected, out-of-place icon of Madonna and Child.  But there it lies.

On a night no different from their ordinary, shepherds were out in the fields outside their city, straining to keep awake and watch over their flocks, as it was the season that lambs would be born.  Suddenly, a bright light appears, and the shepherds sense that they are in the presence of the profoundly holy. They are left speechless, and they begin reaching out, trying and failing to find one another in the midst of the blinding light.  In the middle of their terror, a voice sounds to them: “Do not be afraid… I bring you good news of great joy for every person – in the city has been born a Savior, the Messiah, the Lord. You will find the child wrapped in cloths, and sleeping in a manger.” And just as suddenly as the light had appeared, it went away. The shepherds were left standing there; each thought that he must have had a dream or a hallucination.  Finally, one of them told the others about his dream, and they all rapidly realize that they had each seen and heard the same thing. This was no dream.  With the night almost done, and ready to return home, they decide to look after the child, the Savior of whom they had been told.  As they returned to the city – grimy, dirty, tired from their work – they suddenly feel led to a cave, next to a house – none of them could say how or why – and there they saw him.  It was just as the voice had said – a young child, sleeping, lying in a feeding trough. But this was not what they had expected: they had been told, after all, that this was the Messiah, the Lord – surely he would have been born in a house near the center of the city, where the Great King had been born generations ago; not in this small cave, filled with the ordinary and the earthy – filled with the odor of sweat and blood, with the sight ripped cloths fashioned into blankets and diapers, and with that same child, that same Messiah, resting in the same kind of trough that would normally feed their sheep.  Surely, this birth should have been somewhere else. Not here.  But they had found everything as the voice had said; and the fact that the voice had spoken to them – marginal shepherds on the edges of society – was a surprise in and of itself.  It all didn’t fit, it didn’t make sense – it was a giant non-sequitur from everything that they had been taught to hope for– but there the child lay, just as the voice had said.  There he was.

In today’s world, Christmas is very often a very mechanical, orchestrated, orderly and expected affair.  As I was growing up, Christmas Eve always meant the Lessons & Carols broadcast from King’s College Cambridge at 10:00 am, Dinner with family friends around 7:00 pm, and finally, Midnight Mass at 10:30pm. Christmas Day would bring the opening of presents – no earlier than 7:00 am, a family meal around 2:00 pm, and phone calls to friends and family.  Even tonight’s Gospel from Luke we expect and know by heart – who can’t picture Linus reading tonight’s passage in “A Charlie Brown Christmas”?

But tonight’s Gospel, and everything about the incarnation, is messy. No matter how many times I have heard the story of Christ’s birth in that poor, lowly stable in Bethlehem, no matter how many times I have heard of the shepherds summoned to his cradle, no matter how often I have been left sitting with Mary, pondering all that she has seen in her heart, no matter how much I feel I have this whole thing down – Christmas reminds me that God defies everything that we expect. That even as we expect and look for the Lord enthroned in heavenly splendor, God becomes just as human as we are in Christ Jesus – as the great carol says, “day by day like us he grew; he was little, weak and helpless, tears and smiles like us he knew; and he feeleth for our sadness, and he shareth in our gladness.”  Christmas reminds us that God is not only the God to whom cherubim and seraphim sing in ceaseless praise, but that God became and knows us as we are – that God in Christ Jesus is Word that existed in the beginning before creation, and the Word who also knows bruised elbows and scraped knees, deepest pain and joyous delight.

This is the great joy of Christmas – that God made himself as we are so that we might ever become what he is – that we, too, may share in the divine life of him who humbled himself to share own humanity.  Christmas reminds us that Jesus truly is Emmanuel – God with us – and not only God with us, but God for us.  God among us. God who loves us.

And it is because we experience this joy of the incarnation – the joy and peace brought by this Holy Child – because we know that great love shown to us at the manger, and because we still have God with us today as we meet him in sacraments – that we go and tell others. We tell everyone just how great and unexpected this new grace shown to us at Christmas is – that the grace of God has appeared, bringing salvation to all here and now, in the person of that holy child, lying in the manger. We tell everyone, just as the angels did on that night two thousand years ago: “Fear not! Fear not! For behold, I tell you good tidings of great joy, which shall be to all people. For unto you is born this day a Saviour, which is Christ the Lord.”

Let us pray.
Almighty God, you have poured upon us the new light of
your incarnate Word: Grant that this light, enkindled in our
hearts, may shine forth in our lives; through Jesus Christ our
Lord, who lives and reigns with you, in the unity of the Holy Spirit, one God, now and for ever. Amen.